practicecalculus
Series and multivariable theorems

Green's Theorem: Statement, Orientation and Worked Examples

Green's theorem turns a line integral around a closed curve into a double integral over the region inside. Statement, hypotheses, area formula, examples.

Series and multivariable theorems Updated 3 min read

At a glance

\oint_C P\,dx + Q\,dy = \iint_D \left(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\right) dA
Hypotheses
C is a positively oriented, piecewise smooth, simple closed curve bounding a region D, and P, Q have continuous partial derivatives on an open region containing D
Positive orientation
Counterclockwise, so the region stays on your left
Integrand
Q_x - P_y, the scalar curl of \langle P, Q \rangle
Area formula
A = \frac{1}{2}\oint_C x\,dy - y\,dx
Generalizes to
Stokes' theorem in three dimensions
Course
Calculus 3
On this page
  1. Statement of Green's theorem
  2. What Green's theorem means
  3. Why each hypothesis matters
  4. Worked examples
  5. Common mistakes
  6. Related theorems and guides

Green's theorem relates a line integral around a closed curve in the plane to a double integral over the region it encloses. It says the total circulation around the boundary equals the sum of all the small circulations inside.

Statement of Green's theorem

Let

  1. C be a positively oriented (counterclockwise), piecewise smooth, simple closed curve in the plane, and
  2. D be the region bounded by C, and
  3. P(x, y) and Q(x, y) have continuous partial derivatives on an open region that contains D.

Then

\oint_C P\,dx + Q\,dy = \iint_D \left(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\right) dA

In vector form, with \mathbf{F} = \langle P, Q \rangle, the left side is the circulation \oint_C \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r} and the integrand on the right is the scalar curl Q_x - P_y.

What Green's theorem means

Chop D into tiny squares and add up the circulation of \mathbf{F} around each one. Along every interior edge, two neighboring squares traverse it in opposite directions, so those contributions cancel. Only the outer boundary survives. Meanwhile, the circulation around a tiny square is approximately (Q_x - P_y) times its area. Adding up both ways gives Green's theorem.

Green's theorem region: between y = x² and y = x for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1
The boundary C runs counterclockwise: along the parabola y = x^2 from (0, 0) to (1, 1), then back along the line y = x. The region D stays on the left.

Why each hypothesis matters

Orientation. Traversing C clockwise reverses the sign of the line integral, while the double integral does not change. Always check the direction.

Continuity everywhere inside. The vortex field

\mathbf{F} = \left\langle \frac{-y}{x^2 + y^2},\; \frac{x}{x^2 + y^2} \right\rangle

has Q_x - P_y = 0 at every point except the origin, where it is undefined. Around the unit circle x = \cos t, y = \sin t, the line integral is \int_0^{2\pi} (\sin^2 t + \cos^2 t)\,dt = 2\pi, not 0. Green's theorem does not apply because the origin, inside D, is a point where P and Q are not even defined.

Closed curve. For a curve that does not close up, there is no enclosed region, so the theorem says nothing.

Worked examples

Example 1: compute \oint_C xy\,dx + x^2\,dy around the region in the graph.

Step 1. P = xy and Q = x^2, so Q_x - P_y = 2x - x = x.

Step 2. The region is x^2 \le y \le x for 0 \le x \le 1:

\iint_D x\,dA = \int_0^1 \int_{x^2}^{x} x\,dy\,dx = \int_0^1 (x^2 - x^3)\,dx = \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4} = \frac{1}{12}

Check directly. Along y = x^2 (x = t, 0 \to 1) the integrand is t^3\,dt + t^2(2t\,dt) = 3t^3\,dt, contributing \frac{3}{4}. Along y = x back from (1, 1) to (0, 0) it is 2t^2\,dt with t from 1 to 0, contributing -\frac{2}{3}. The total is \frac{3}{4} - \frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{12}. Same answer, more work.

Example 2: area of an ellipse. Choose P = -\frac{y}{2} and Q = \frac{x}{2}, so Q_x - P_y = 1 and the double integral is the area:

A = \frac{1}{2}\oint_C x\,dy - y\,dx

For the ellipse x = a\cos t, y = b\sin t, 0 \le t \le 2\pi: x\,dy - y\,dx = (ab\cos^2 t + ab\sin^2 t)\,dt = ab\,dt. So A = \frac{1}{2}\cdot 2\pi ab = \pi ab.

Example 3: a messy field, an easy answer. Evaluate \oint_C (x^2 - y)\,dx + (x + y^3)\,dy around the unit circle, counterclockwise. Here Q_x - P_y = 1 - (-1) = 2, so the integral is 2 \cdot \text{area} = 2\pi.

Common mistakes

  1. Swapping the order in the integrand. It is Q_x - P_y, not P_y - Q_x or P_x - Q_y.
  2. Ignoring orientation. A clockwise curve gives the negative of the double integral.
  3. Using it across a singularity. Check that P and Q are smooth on all of D, not just on C.

Green's theorem is the flat case of Stokes' theorem, and its flux form is the two-dimensional divergence theorem. Since Q_x - P_y = 0 for gradient fields by Clairaut's theorem, conservative fields have zero circulation. For the double integrals on the right side, see double integrals.

Practice it now

Green's theorem

Solve real problems on this topic with instant feedback, hints and a step-by-step walkthrough for every answer. Free, no sign-up needed to start.

Practice this lesson

Frequently asked questions

What does Green's theorem say?

For a positively oriented, piecewise smooth, simple closed curve C bounding a region D, and P, Q with continuous partial derivatives near D, \oint_C P\,dx + Q\,dy = \iint_D (Q_x - P_y)\,dA.

What is positive orientation in Green's theorem?

Counterclockwise around the region, or more generally the direction in which the region stays on your left as you walk along the curve. Going clockwise multiplies the line integral by -1.

When should I use Green's theorem?

Use it when a line integral around a closed curve is tedious, especially when the curve has several pieces, and Q_x - P_y is simple. Also use it in reverse to compute areas with a line integral.

Why does Green's theorem fail for the vortex field around the origin?

The field \left\langle \frac{-y}{x^2 + y^2}, \frac{x}{x^2 + y^2} \right\rangle has Q_x - P_y = 0 away from the origin, but is undefined at the origin. If the curve encloses the origin, the hypothesis fails, and in fact the line integral around the unit circle is 2\pi, not 0.

Written by the PracticeCalculus team

We build interactive calculus lessons and write every page to be clear and correct. Spotted something off? Tell us and we will fix it.